Skip to main content

The Three Causes of Sin

By Shrii Shrii Ánandamúrti

Note: An abridged version of this discourse appears in the chapter “The Three Causes of Sin” in The Great Universe.

Note: This is the extracted notes from the original discourse "The Three Causes of Sin" for class.

Human beings are social beings, hence, they have to follow certain social codes. But they must follow some spiritual codes as well. Because of illusion or some other reasons, if people break these codes, these “dos” and “don’ts”, sometimes we call it “sin” or Pápa and at other times, “crime” or Aparádha. If the violation is in the spiritual code, rather the religious code, it is termed as “sin”. If the violation is against the legal code it is known as “crime”.

Sin is sometimes based entirely on dogmas and not on cardinal human values. Wise people will never entertain a conception of sin based on religious dogma. Rather, they will judge with discrimination the correctness of the code according to cardinal human values.

Vyása said in the Puránas:

Aśtádashapuráneśu Vyásasya vacanádvayam
Paropakárah puńyáya pápáya parapiid́anam.

That is, that action which checks the progress of the society is sin, and that which accelerates social progress is virtue.

Cardinal human values are the silver lining between the psycho-spiritual world and the spiritual world. They are not based on religious dogma. Hence, people should revolt against dogma and follow values rooted in rationality and humanity.

In Sanskrit:

  • What should be done but is not done is called Pratyaváya.
  • What should not be done but is done is called Pápa.
  • The combined term is Pátaka.

The Three Causes of Sin

  1. Shortage of physical and psychic pabula: Without basic necessities and intellectual resources, people lose their moral compass. In poverty and ignorance, people commit sins and crimes.
  2. Non-utilization of over-accumulated physical and psychic pabula: Excess without use leads to mental degeneration. The wealthy become parasites and exploiters if they don’t utilize wealth and intellect for collective welfare.
  3. Stagnancy in the physical and psychic strata: Lack of progressive movement leads to dogma, decay, and societal obstruction. Dynamism is life; stagnancy is death.

Second Cause Expanded

The greed of the have’s enslaves the have-not’s. Over-accumulation leads to addiction, aimlessness, and even suicide. The over-rich mislead the poor and misutilize wealth.

Third Cause Expanded

True progress occurs only in the spiritual realm. Physical and intellectual activity without spiritual direction is like running in circles. Stagnancy caused by blind traditionalism must be uprooted. Dogma must be broken with force, if necessary.

Bhayáńáḿ bhayaḿ bhiiśańaḿ bhiiśańánáḿ
Gatih prańináḿ pávanaḿ pávanánám.

He is the fear of fear – the purifier of all. He is the destination of all movement.

The Role of Sadvipras

  • To remove shortage, minimum requirements must be guaranteed to all – physically and intellectually.
  • To address over-accumulation, conscious spiritual and intellectual leadership is necessary.
  • To combat stagnancy, dogmas must be smashed with the sledgehammer of truth and dynamism.

Without the Sadvipra – the spiritual revolutionary – society cannot move forward. Dogmatic-minded people obstruct progress. If the Sadvipras do not act, society will perish.

Let the Sadvipras Arise!

30 May 1970, Muzaffarpur

Read more

Discourse Analysis: The Three Causes of Sin

1. Basic Information

Field Details
Title of Discourse The Three Causes of Sin
Author/Speaker Shrii Shrii Ánandamúrti
Date / Occasion 30 May 1970
Location / Audience Muzaffarpur / General spiritual audience
Source / Reference A Few Problems Solved -Part 6

2. Theme & Central Idea

  • Core Theme: The philosophical and practical understanding of sin and its root causes.
  • Key Issue: Differentiating sin from crime and identifying the three fundamental causes of sin.
  • Central Message: Sin arises from systemic and individual imbalances—lack, misuse, and stagnation—and must be addressed by spiritually awakened individuals (Sadvipras).

3. Purpose of the Discourse

  • Aim: To inform, awaken, and inspire action against the root causes of sin.
  • Target Audience: Spiritually inclined individuals, social reformers, and intellectuals.
  • Prompted Reflection: Encourages critical thinking about dogma, social justice, and personal responsibility.

4. Structure and Organization

  • Logical Sections: Definitions and distinctions, philosophical grounding, the three causes of sin, solutions and the role of Sadvipras.
  • Progression: From conceptual clarity to practical application.
  • Support: Scriptural references, real-world examples, and analogies.

5. Key Concepts and Terminology

  • Pápa – Sin (doing what should not be done)
  • Pratyaváya – Sin (not doing what should be done)
  • Pátaka – Combined term for Pápa and Pratyaváya
  • Sadvipra – Spiritually awakened revolutionary
  • Pabula – Nourishment or fuel (physical/psychic)
  • Redefinitions: Sin is redefined beyond religious dogma to align with cardinal human values.

6. Contextual Analysis

  • Historical/Social Background: Post-colonial India, Cold War era, rise of materialism and political unrest.
  • Cultural/Philosophical Context: Synthesizes Vedic wisdom with modern socio-political critique.
  • Relevance: Timeless—applies to both historical and contemporary societal challenges.

7. Philosophical/Doctrinal Points

  • Major Ideas: Sin is not merely religious but ethical and social. Cardinal human values supersede legal or dogmatic codes.
  • New Insights: Sin arises from systemic imbalance, not just individual fault.
  • Alignment: Consistent with Ánandamúrti’s broader teachings on Neohumanism and PROUT.

8. Psychological & Ethical Insights

  • Human Behavior: Driven by needs, misguidance, and stagnation.
  • Ethical Recommendations: Uphold cardinal values, reject dogma, act with dynamism.
  • Moral Code: Rooted in rationality, compassion, and spiritual awareness.

9. Logical Reasoning and Rhetoric

  • Key Arguments: Sin and crime must be distinguished. Three causes of sin are systemic and interlinked.
  • Analogies: Mango grove (over-accumulation), Grinding bull (movement without progress), Cart blocking the road (stagnancy).
  • Style: Analytical, didactic, and occasionally poetic.

10. Emotional and Aesthetic Tone

  • Tone: Serious, urgent, and inspirational.
  • Language: Direct, symbolic, and rich in metaphor.
  • Artistic Expression: Use of Sanskrit verses and vivid imagery.

11. Practical Implications

  • Application: Social reform, personal discipline, spiritual activism.
  • Instructions: Ensure minimum needs for all. Prevent misuse of wealth and intellect. Combat stagnancy with force if needed.
  • Relevance: Vital for both individual growth and societal evolution.

12. Comparative Insights

  • Relation to Other Texts: Builds on Vedic and Upanishadic ethics.
  • Contrast: Rejects blind adherence to religious dogma.
  • Unique Contribution: Integrates spiritual philosophy with socio-political activism.

13. Spiritual Depth

  • Mentions: Parama Puruśa (Supreme Consciousness), Brahma, Sádhaná.
  • Inner Transformation: Encourages dynamic spiritual evolution.
  • Guidance: Emphasizes the role of Sadvipras in spiritual and social upliftment.

14. Impact and Reception

  • Influence: Foundational to PROUT and Neohumanist philosophy.
  • Follow-up Works: Expanded in other discourses and writings by Ánandamúrti.
  • Widely Cited Ideas: Role of Sadvipras, cardinal human values, three causes of sin.

15. Summary of Teachings

  • Sin must be judged by cardinal human values, not dogma.
  • Crime is legal; sin is ethical/spiritual.
  • First cause of sin: Lack of physical/psychic pabula.
  • Second cause: Non-utilization of over-accumulated pabula.
  • Third cause: Stagnancy in physical/psychic spheres.
  • Over-accumulation leads to moral decay and social injustice.
  • Stagnancy is the most dangerous—requires forceful correction.
  • Sadvipras are essential for societal balance and progress.
  • Movement is life; stagnation is death.
  • Humanity must reject dogma and embrace dynamic spirituality.